Refining Questions
Blog Post by Carolyn
Hill
I spoke with Leslie this weekend and found that my
previous question: “How can art education remain relevant to high school
students in the 21st century?” was too broad. I cannot possibly hope
to answer this question, much less in the time allotted to do so. So Leslie advised me to focus more on my
classroom and narrow my question. I have come up with a new question after
doing some research.
Saturday I read a great article called “Beautiful Brains”
from this October’s issue of National Geographic magazine. In it the author
talked about how teenage brains are evolutionarily programmed to be the way they
are to help them “leave the nest” (Dobbs, 2011). In this article,
Dobbs also reminds us of teen interests in “excitement, novelty, risk and the
company of peers” (Dobbs, 2011). I decided to
incorporate these interests into my question after reading the article.
Question: How are
teenage inclinations toward excitement, novelty and peer influence incorporated
into teaching art to my high school students? (I decided to leave out risk.)
Question Revised:
How are teenage interests incorporated into art instruction at Wayne Country
Day School?
If you have any suggestions, please feel free to make
them. I will post more about this later.
Work Cited:
Dobbs, D. (2011, October). Beautiful brains. National
Geographic , pp. 37-59.





